Saturday, August 12, 2023

So many ECR Zeros on STAAR? Why?

Check out these scorepoint graphs: 



Why so many zeros? Well...it was new. And 3rd graders are NINE. But perhaps we need to look at the obvious...or what is obviously hidden before we start diving into TEKS.





Here's an analogy - did you know that if you break open a cottonwood twig, that there is a STAR of Texas hidden inside? (Project Learning Tree has a cool lesson about it here.) The star was there all along, but you didn't know it was there. 

In the TECH world, they study the "user experience." Kids all over the state told us that they didn't have an ECR on the assessment. Why did they think that? Remember - most kiddos are taking this test on a chromebook tiny screen with no mouse. Here's what they saw: 


Semantics: 

Students are asked to write an argumentative essay. Not an ECR. Could the problem be semantics? Kids need to know they will be asked to write a composition or an essay. (And not an S A. Before my kids saw the word typed out, they thought I was just saying two letters.) ECR is an assessment item type vocabulary and is not used for kids on the test. Same goes for passages - that's what we call them. That's not the academic language used on the assessment - STAAR says "selections." Our academic synonyms might be causing some of the confusion. 

User Experience: 


And...did they SEE a place to type the essay? Sure, there's a little arrow that says to scroll down. The scrollbar that says there is more to see doesn't show up until you hover over the right hand side of the screen on some computers. On other computers it does. 

That's a wonky user experience for something kids aren't familiar with. With which kids aren't familiar. Whatever. You get the point. 

Our solution: Kids need to be beyond familiar with the TECH elements. They need to be fluent with them. And our words need to match their experience - "You'll be asked to write and essay or a composition. You'll need to scroll down or use your arrow keys to see where you need to type." 



Font and Text Features: 

Another problem is the way the paired passages appear. 

See how these scroll on the same "page"? It looks like "Laws for Less Trash" might be a subheading for "Rewards for Recycling." 
That's a problem. Kids need to make sure they are attending to the bold material at the beginning of the passage and know that "selections" means two different passages. Another semantics issue. 
    But this is also a text feature issue. I didn't see any subheadings in the third grade test, so I had to go to 4th grade. 

See how the titles of passage are center justified and of a certain size font? Now compare to the subheading: left justified and a smaller font. These are text features that serve as cues for readers about what the author is doing as well as when a new passage/selection appears. 

It will be important to teach kids how to understand and decode the text features and navigation elements (like that little almost invisible grey arrow on the right hand side of each screen that says there's more below and you need to scroll down.) 



Using Cambium Components for Self-Regulation: 


The very top row is designed to help students understand and see how much of the test they have completed with the blue bar and the percentage complete. They know how much energy they need to use and how much time to save. But they can also see where they have and have not answered questions. The little red triangle tells kids where they have NOT answered questions. This would have been a huge cue to students that they'd missed answering the essay question. But did they know it was there? Were they fluent in using the tools to monitor their progress and to check for completion? 

Before we start digging into TEKS (and especially accountability ratings and class rosters), let's do some talking with kids about their experience and their approach when taking the exam. Our solutions can start with modeling how the platform works and using similar tools during daily classroom instruction so that students are fluent with technology experiences beyond a familiarity with a tutorial or mention of the tools. Let's make sure students understand the user experience and how to use the tools to enhance their comprehension and demonstration of grade level curriculum. Until then, they're walking in a Texas creekbed under the cottonwoods, not knowing about the hidden treasures all around them. 



4 comments:

  1. After attend your training with Region 16, to be honest, I did learn of new components on the testing site. However, I’ve been out of the testing rooms for a couple of years.
    I can say that in my district the teachers were aware of the components of the platform. Students were given opportunities to practice and become confident with the technology.
    As far as the progress bar that keeps tabs, I can see the pros and cons there. I like that as a tester I can see how far I’ve gone. But for me personally, I also do t like the progress bar at times. For example, when I’m doing a school survey and I see that I’m only 26% in , I get frustrated! This app plies to Kindle Book reading and Eduhero training. (So many slides and that progress bar seems to not move fast enough.) I can see students getting extremely frustrated! It as with paper, it’s all’s about building the stamina of students. Letting them practice keeping focused and knowing when to take “Brain Breaks”. I know several schools in several districts that know this and worked to help their students be successful. I agree that looking at the technology components along with data is and TEKS is going to be beneficial. AND taking into account the developmentally appropriate task of having young students attend to a screen for the duration of the test.
    You’ve brought up some great points that should lead us all to reconsider or introspect on how we can better serve our students. Thank you for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree about the technology in the above comment. We were told by TEA in August to make sure we had ample practice in the system. And we did. We built it into our year.

      Thank you for sharing the state scores. Can’t wait to compare against ours.

      Delete
  2. You make several good points here (either explicitly or implied) regarding disparities.

    -Disparities between the language we use in class and the language STAAR uses.

    -Disparities between different types of writing that a student can and will be asked to do.

    -Disparities between the STAAR and "real life."

    Perhaps others as well.

    These disparities (among other things) is why I I have said for some time now that STAAR test-taking strategies is a skill set by itself, and as such, should be taught explicitly (and somewhat separately) from the skills within the TEKS themselves. Until standardized testing in Texas changes, if we don't do this, we are setting up our kids to fail the STAAR.

    ReplyDelete